you're reading...
Uncategorized

We Need to Move Beyond Cookie-Cutter Schooling & Embrace Diversity in How We Educate Our Children

Although my mother knows that I read The New York Times online, if she sees an article of interest in her print copy, she cuts it out and sends it to me. Recently, she sent me an article about Brother Brian Carty, founder of the De La Salle Academy, a private middle school for the academically talented but economically underprivileged in Manhattan. She wrote on top, “What do you think?” knowing that I often have strong opinions about education.

I think my mother was curious about my opinion because there are aspects of De La Salle that seem rather draconian. Kids can be expelled for gossip, lip gloss is forbidden, as is dating. I suspect my mother would think I might find these rules over the top. I didn’t. The school is also described as a throwback, eshewing smart boards so kids can learn the fine art of note-taking. Perhaps she wondered if I thought this was too outmoded for today’s world. It may be, but I don’t harbor any judgments toward Brother Carty or his school for their old-fashioned approach to teaching.

I have, instead, only appreciation for an educator like Brother Carty whose passion for teaching and for his students is obvious, who has dedicated his life to giving smart, underprivileged kids a rare opportunity. Do I wish all underprivileged kids had such opportunities? Of course. Do I think this school is some sort of ideal? No. Do I want to see a range of schools with different styles, different foci, different missions proliferate? More than anything.

While I believe that every school should have as part of its mission the goal of graduating solutionaries who are eager to take their place among creative problem-solvers who will forge a healthy, humane and peaceful world through whatever careers they pursue, I also believe that there are many ways to arrive at this goal. There are curricular approaches that suit different children, subject matter that is more relevant to some than others, styles of teaching and learning that fit a diverse audience.

And this is why I am so frustrated by cookie-cutter public education proponents who are often hostile toward charter schools, independent schools, alternative schools, unschooling, schools-within-schools, and so on. I know that there is potential for diluting limited public resources when we invite charter schools into our state, but it saddened me that Brother Carty must spend so much time fundraising in order to give his low-income students a De La Salle education.

Zoe Weil
President, Institute for Humane Education
Author of The Power and Promise of Humane Education

About these ads

About zoeweil

I'm the co-founder and President of the Institute for Humane Education (IHE). IHE works to create a world in which we all live humanely, sustainably, and peaceably. We do this by training people to be humane educators who teach about the pressing issues of our time and inspire people to work for change while making healthy, humane, and restorative choices in their daily lives. We also work to advance the field of humane education, and to provide tools and inspiration to people everywhere so that they can live examined, meaningful lives. I'm also a writer. So far I've written six books and several articles.

Discussion

5 thoughts on “We Need to Move Beyond Cookie-Cutter Schooling & Embrace Diversity in How We Educate Our Children

  1. Extremely well put. I couldn’t agree more.

    Posted by Michael G. | November 8, 2010, 7:19 am
  2. I agree! It is sad when unique schools are closed or worst not opened because of lack of funds or creative thought.

    Currently in Eugene, where I leave, they are set to close up to 6 schools, all small successful (in all the ways the states requires) that offer a range of types and models of learning. It is a tragedy because I know that it is going to be harder for those schools to open again.

    The problem with some of the charter debate is the lack of questioning of the purpose of the creators though. I do agree a school found on a strong vision and community or sole leadership is a welcome entry into the world of education, no maker where it stands on the public to private septum, but do not believe we are served by Corporate or for-profit schools. I am all for charters, but we must have a transparency in the reasons for opening.

    As I work to open my own school, I understand my ideas of life and learning will not be shared by everyone, nor do I believe my way alone is the answer. If I did, it would be no different then the current idea that one-size will fit all.

    Thanks for reminding us we need to seek biodiversity in our schools!

    David

    Posted by dloitz | November 8, 2010, 12:15 pm
  3. But where, dear Zoe, would school be without lip gloss?

    Posted by Kirsten Olson | November 10, 2010, 11:26 pm
  4. Bring on the portfolio districts.
    C

    Posted by Chad Sansing | November 14, 2010, 9:35 am

Join the Conversation

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 4,076 other followers

%d bloggers like this: