you're reading...
Education in the Media, School Stories, Student Voices

Student Slams Ex-CNN Anchor, Union President, and Students First

This piece was originally published on StuVoice.org.

Are you a supporter of sexual predators?

We can all agree that that is a ridiculous question to ask, yet, former journalist Campbell Brown did just that in her Wall Street Journal opinion piece titled, “Teachers Unions Go to Bat for Sexual Predators.”

It gets worse.

A Twitter argument began. Brown and UFT President Randi Weingarten fought over Brown’s failure to disclose that she is the wife of both a Mitt Romney political advisor and a board member for Students First NY. Both well known entities that do not support teachers unions.

Weingarten then accused Brown of having taken her stance because Brown’s husband is a Republican. Meanwhile, Brown continued suggesting that teachers unions are supporting sexual predators.

I injected myself (@zakmal) into this spat Tweeting:
“You’re all acting immature. No one supports sexual predators. Period.” 

Brown responded:
“You may not feel this affects you directly, but it is [a] big deal to the victims and families. [This is] an important change worth fighting for.”

This response frustrated me. I replied:
“I never said it doesn’t affect me. This Twitter fight is not constructive and isn’t doing kids justice.”

Students First NY joins in by Tweeting that they agreed this Twitter bickering was senseless.

Next I asked, “So are we going to end this now and focus on the students?” In a response, they said that this issue is about students. My final follow up requested that Students First “Take [the] lead,” considering their claim that they are putting students first.

I got no response.

As respected educator Chris Lehmann wisely shared, “There is arguing to learn and there is arguing to win.” This was an argument to win.

Melvin Hydleburg, 17, a rising senior at Robert H. Lehman High School said at the New York Education Reform hearing at CUNY Hostos on July 26, “We have gotten caught up in the finger-pointing game.” He went on to say, “We are simply too content with placing blame. Why don’t we step back and realize that a failure for one party is a failure for all parties?”

Failing for all parties
This idea was played out beautifully in a Twitter smackdown.
Brown approached our failure to protect students in an inappropriate and unprofessional manner.
Weingarten failed to respond in a way that maintains the pride of the teaching profession.
Students First NY got involved in what was a clear publicity campaign by bashing Weingarten in a mass e-mail.

Rather than working to empower students, teachers, and parents to fight against the egregious acts of a few, these high-profile Tweeters spent the day arguing to win. That sounds like something an angry ex-girlfriend or boyfriend would do. Let’s leave “winning” Twitter fights to the angry ex’s. Protecting our kids, our students, from the horrendous acts of child predators is where we should want to focus on winning. Otherwise, the only losers will be our students.


Zak Malmed is an 18 year old student who is sick and tired of seeing these “adults” fighting for us. He is also a student organizer for StuVoice.org

About these ads

Discussion

3 thoughts on “Student Slams Ex-CNN Anchor, Union President, and Students First

  1. Way more perceptive than the so-called adults in this fight.

    Keep in mind: this has nothing to do with sexual predators or anything of the sort. It’s about finding leverage to destroy unions and undermine non-profit public education. Period. Brown isn’t doing this because her husband is a Republican. She’s doing it to make herself a name and to pick low-hanging fruit.

    After all, who would publicly ‘defend abusers’? But of course, there are none in this story: only accused people. Last I checked, they are innocent until proven guilty. They have legal rights. And the union has the obligation to provide them with whatever protection from false prosecution and removal of due process as it can. Period.

    Brown is simply playing the same kind of game that the idiot congressman from Florida played in following that well-worn Joe McCarthy playbook. Communists, child abusers, socialists, CONSTRUCTIVISTS. . . . .what’s the difference. If it bleeds, it leads, and if you can’t find a headless body in a topless bar, go for one of the other old standbys.

    Posted by Michael Paul Goldenberg | August 2, 2012, 9:24 pm
  2. A typical “Catch-22″, like, “When did you stop beating your wife???”

    Posted by Brent Snavely | August 2, 2012, 9:39 pm
  3. I love the points you make here. Those types of Twitter arguments (both sides included) become bully pulpits that use victims for political sport. It makes me sick.

    Posted by John T. Spencer | August 2, 2012, 11:29 pm

Join the Conversation

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 4,078 other followers

Comments are subject to moderation.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 4,078 other followers

%d bloggers like this: