you're reading...

School bells are undemocratic

While teaching my grade 8 students, I wanted to discuss the idea of distractions, so I read them an excerpt from Rework by Jason Fried & David Heinemeier Hansson that discusses how interruption is the enemy of productivity: 

Interruptions break your workday into a series of work moments. Forty-Five minutes and then you have a call. Fifteen minutes and then you have lunch. An hour later, you have an afternoon meeting. Before you know it, it’s five o’clock, and you’ve only had a couple uninterrupted hours to get your work done. You can’t get meaningful things done when your constantly going start, stop, start, stop… 

And go all the way with it. A successful alone-time period means letting go of communication addiction. During alone time, give up instant messages, phone calls, e-mail, and meetings… Your day is under seige by interruptions. It’s on you to fight back. 

My class proceeded to have a very interesting conversation about all of the distractions they have in the day. Many of them could relate to the ‘communication addiction’ that the excerpt referred to. We all admitted that sometimes we are the annoyed (the person who would like to tell others to ‘screw off’) and the annoying (the person who should be told to ‘screw off’). 

It didn’t take long for some of my students to identifying other kinds of distractions that they were not responsible for. Ethan, a grade 8 student of mine, blogged his thoughts for me. Here’s Ethan’s take on how undemocratic school bells are: 

School bells, the most ridiculous invention on earth. Some people want to spend a certain amount of time on certain subjects, for example; if I prefer math more than social, shouldn’t I have the right to stay as long as I like at math, and as long as I learn something and don’t screw off? No, instead, a inanimate, ringing tin can have the right to tell me what to do, where to go, and make decisions for me. A piece of metal has more authority than a living human being! Truthfully, this thought makes me feel small, and without any say. I think students should have the right to learn what they want, when they want, wherever they want and however they want to do it! If I could take health and science classes all day I would. Why? Because I am facinated about how things work, especially the human body. As for social, i don’t especially want to know what happened all those years ago. I’m also not saying that social is pointless either, many people find the past very interesting, just not me. School’s purpose in my eyes is to prepare you for the future, so why not be able to tune your studies to what you would like to become? 


Ethan’s point is well taken. He’s begging for the opportunity to be given more rights and responsibilities than the archaic school bell schedule can ever give him. He’s searching for a more democratic version of schooling. It’s time we took students like Ethan seriously.


About joebower

I believe students should experience success and failure not as reward and punishment but as information.


4 thoughts on “School bells are undemocratic

  1. Wow, what an insightful post. I can see they have be indoctrinated well 🙂 Seriously, I agree with Ethan. If it could only be . . .

    Posted by Matt Guthrie | March 25, 2010, 1:04 pm
  2. Joe, thanks so much for sharing the quote from Rework and especially for your student’s words.

    I wonder how many students, teachers, AND administrators feel the same way, but have yet to find a way to speak or act out against the status quo. I’m reading Moral Leadership by Thomas J. Sergiovanni. He assembles research and argues alongside it that meaningfulness, responsibility, knowledge of results, and flow cannot be achieved by teachers at school without giving them measures of discretion and independence. The same must hold true for students. We can’t expect them to find meaning at school, to take responsibility for their work, to be curious about its results, to self-assess, or to enter a sustainable state of self-fulfillment that offers a reprieve from their stressors if we don’t stop arbitrarily capping their learning and micromanaging its atomization.

    What kind of school day would you run without bells? Please also forward my question to your students.

    All the best,

    Posted by Chad Sansing | March 25, 2010, 1:28 pm
  3. Joe,

    Getting rid of bells is one of the easiest steps to liberating schools. They are but a remnant of one of the initial functions of schools-to train the working and managerial class. Essential to that training was punctuality and timed breaks, and people willing to watch others to make sure they abided by the schedules of factories.

    They have nothing to do with learning.


    Posted by Adam Burk | March 25, 2010, 6:05 pm

Join the Conversation

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 4,100 other followers

Comments are subject to moderation.

%d bloggers like this: