you're reading...

The Collective Individual

On this blustery cold day in the Pacific Northwest, I sit, ready to contemplate education and learning.  Not just any type of education and learning, but the progressive nature of learning.  The collective individuality that encompasses progressive education is at the heart of learning and infuses the new ideas and experiences necessary to grow as an individual. 

     So, what do I mean about the collective individual?  Who is it?  What is it?  How is it accomplished?  Well, let us first back up and think of how we define learning of a person:  Usually it is either through a collectivity, team work environment or situation, or that of an individual, personalized and private work.  It is my assertion, that as educators, and learners, that we must stop trying to combat the collective vs. the individual, or group projects vs. individual assignments, but instead view education holistically, from a different angle. 

      In order to do this, we must, as educators we must stop compartmentalizing subjects and even more importantly, types of learning.  Often times, the progressive educator will look at different subject matters and say, “those types of things should be interdisciplinary and interconnected,” but sometimes, we fall and slip into the realm of singling and viewing under a microscopic one particular part of the way in which we learn. This could be a symptomatic problem, starting with Piaget, I don’t know, but it definitely does not seem to work constantly to bring subjects or thoughts together. 

      So, if we can view learning in a WHOLE approach, that encompasses any and all things, then we can begin to think of how we take the entire scope, or realm, of learning and use collectivism and individualism as a co-partnership in new ways to spark the mind, to innovative new theory or practice and to be creatively driven, firstly and foremost. 

      The individual must be recognized.  We are all different, we all have particular abilities, characteristics and we are all capable of learning that is unique unto ourselves.  The mere fact that I mentioned, “we and all” three times in describing the individual, speaks to the manner of how interconnected these two elements actually are.  There has to be a self-motivation that exists, one that drives the individual to learn for themselves and for the world.  This is needs to be an individual trait that is nurtured and given confidence by a support community, but that ultimately, must rely on the individual themselves.  There is a discipline and confidence that also must be understood by the individual, in believing in their own capabilities.  Finally, there needs to be a firm structure in place (not in a legalistic sense, but outworking support) that does not necessarily force, but surely, encourages the individual to individually think for themselves and to use their own critical senses and past experience to learn. 

     On the same level, the collectivism must be emphasized.  It begins with the community and a sense of belonging.  Each individual must collectively come together and feel safe, encouraged and most importantly, collectively involved in any and all activities (if they so choose).  The collectivism extends beyond being in a safe, belonging environment, but also must foster a sense of self worth, creative and innovative posture, and must be underlined with a never ending sense of encouragement and responsibility by the group, to help an individual reach their goal.  A true sense of community must be at the center of this collectivism, relying on all the parts, working together, equally contributing and equally encouraged, to be apart of a place that is focused on learning, either one thing in particular or many things randomly.  The collectivism, is not necessarily completely about being one, mechanistic body or army, that follows one set of rules or actions, but rather, as a functionary net, underneath the tight rope of life, just in case you fall, or to give you encouragement to go on, even if everything does not seem right. 

   Let us create the collective individual, both in the progressive educational world and all learning worlds.  It must firmly be recognized and enacted, that both the individual be emphasized, with all of his or her, creative, personalized character and ideas, while being collectively guided, with an undertone and sense of community, compassion, and encouragement, constantly infectious by the equally democratic, equally motivated and equally needed individuals in the surrounding environment. 

   The collective individual learns through the lens of self exploration, group discussion and experiential moments, guided constantly through a world which is filled with a collective community that inspires that learning to happen.

-Casey K. Caronna

About caseykcaronna

A 27 year old Master of Arts in Education Degree holder from the progressive, liberal arts school, Goddard College. I am interested in Holistic, Community, Progressive, Democratic and Student-Centered Education. I am currently a part-time employee with the Boy Scouts of America. I am writing my first book on holistic education and looking for full time employment in education, throughout the United States and Canada. I am interested in all things education and hope to make trans-formative changes to the educational system(s) in America and in the process help to improve the lives of the individuals in whom it serves.


5 thoughts on “The Collective Individual

  1. I like this Casey….sort of parallel to my idea of Human Scale Education. I have moved away from using the word individual as I view as a product of the capitalistic mind set, that is about the needs of only oneself. Same with the term Self-ownership….though I believe both have there place….I like this term the collective individual….that is nice…. I would say Collective Person…. as Person for me has a more emotional feeling for me….

    Great ideas here….how have you started to practice this in your work as a Sub?

    Hope all is well, No snow here yet…..soon though.


    Posted by dloitz | November 22, 2010, 10:09 pm
  2. Hi David,
    Thanks for the kind remarks. The word individual and self-ownership is intentional. While, I do think it as an association with capitalism, I am not sure if that is a completely bad thing. The point, is emphasize that there is a specific individualistic purpose and self creation, and ownership (to own) to learning.

    I don’t think that it is only through a selfish purpose, but I do think that the collectivism is mostly through a support system that is co-dependent on all individuals involved. The work and learning done for others and the world, starts, I believe through an examination first at the self, it is an individualistic journey, that eventually works towards an outward being of others.

    I think there is co-dependent upon both. Just as I think the best system, economically, is through a socialistic system, that has elements both of capital and communism, the same is true with learning, both having elements of self-individualism and collectivism. I don’t buy into the notion that all learning is done collectively or through groups. I do believe that learning happens for self, by self as well. I think it is important that it is done this way as well, because I think it is through a WHOLE approach of ALL things that learning exists.

    I have concerns with the word, person, because I don’t think it was really directly relating to what I was meaning in my post. The Collective Individual, is designed, so that critical thinking, examining, action and self-reflecting, happens both simultaneously, through self and through community (others).

    What are others thoughts?

    Posted by educationalrevolutionist | November 23, 2010, 12:09 am
  3. This is a animated video on Changing the Education Paradigm narrated by Sir Ken Robinson is well worth a look. It hits home and addresses a practical look at how our educational system does not work and how we can look at changing the fundamental paradigm of education and change our standardization and industrialization of education.

    Posted by Sandra | November 27, 2010, 11:34 am
  4. Hi Sandra,
    Yes, this is a great video. I have been using it all over YouTube, Goddard Education NING sites, ect.

    I find it strange that you attach it to my blog. Unless you think my blog is fundamentally different then this narrative by Ken Robinson. I do not think it is at all. I am in much, if not all agreement with him. However, you may just be using it, because of how David Loitz and I were using capitalism and education in interconnected ways.

    I do not think Ken Robin, would disagree with my assertion of the Collective Individual. My point, was not to keep in place the same tired system, based upon the production model, but rather, just to help collective minded individuals remember, that there is an individualistic portion, that is individuality and independent thinking that is involved and evolves with progressive education.

    Could you explain to me, your thoughts behind the posting of this video here? Thanks!!

    Posted by Casey Caronna | November 28, 2010, 1:07 am


  1. Pingback: You Want Ideas? We Have Ideas! « Cooperative Catalyst - November 22, 2010

Join the Conversation

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 4,104 other followers

Comments are subject to moderation.

%d bloggers like this: